United States Tenth Circuit

In a suit alleging that plaintiff-retail investigator's discharge violated Title VII, was inconsistent with the parties' implied contract terms, and violated the doctrine of promissory estoppel, summary judgment for former employer-department store is affirmed where, on the limited record developed by plaintiff during discovery, summary judgment was appropriate.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/09/2006
• Published 11/10/2006

Judges

• GORSUCH, Circuit Judge., Before LUCERO, O'BRIEN, and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Andrew T. Brake, (Lee T. Judd on the briefs) Andrew T. Brake, P.C., Englewood, Colorado, for Plaintiff-Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• William A. Wright, Sherman & Howard L.L.C., Denver, Colorado (Raymond M. Deeny, Sherman & Howard L.L.C., Colorado Springs, Colorado, with him on the brief), for Defendant-Appellee.