United States Tenth Circuit
US v. Carrizales-Toledo, 05-2308
An order denying a motion to suppress evidence of marijuana and incriminating statements in a prosecution for drug related offenses is affirmed where: 1) an agent had a reasonable suspicion that defendant was engaged in illegal activities, and thus an initial stop did not violate defendant's Fourth Amendment rights; and 2) defendant's second confession, which was voluntary and occurred after the Miranda warnings were given, was admissible, and thus cured any potential concerns regarding initial statements.
Appellate Information
- Decided 07/20/2006
- Published 07/21/2006
Judges
- McCONNELL, Circuit Judge., Before O'BRIEN, McWILLIAMS, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Tenth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Dennis J. Candelaria, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Las Cruces, NM, for the Defendant-Appellant., Terri J. Abernathy, Assistant United States Attorney (David C. Iglesias, United States Attorney, with her on the brief), Las Cruces, NM, for the Plaintiff-Appellee.