Skip to main content

United States Tenth Circuit


US v. Carrizales-Toledo, 05-2308

An order denying a motion to suppress evidence of marijuana and incriminating statements in a prosecution for drug related offenses is affirmed where: 1) an agent had a reasonable suspicion that defendant was engaged in illegal activities, and thus an initial stop did not violate defendant's Fourth Amendment rights; and 2) defendant's second confession, which was voluntary and occurred after the Miranda warnings were given, was admissible, and thus cured any potential concerns regarding initial statements.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/20/2006
  • Published 07/21/2006

Judges

  • McCONNELL, Circuit Judge., Before O'BRIEN, McWILLIAMS, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Dennis J. Candelaria, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Las Cruces, NM, for the Defendant-Appellant., Terri J. Abernathy, Assistant United States Attorney (David C. Iglesias, United States Attorney, with her on the brief), Las Cruces, NM, for the Plaintiff-Appellee.
Copied to clipboard