Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Tenth Circuit


Herrera v. Lufkin Indus., Inc., 04-8089

Summary judgment on hostile work environment and breach of contract claims, judgment as a matter of law on intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, and a discovery ruling in favor of defendant-employer are affirmed where there was no error in the district court's rulings.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/31/2006
  • Published 05/31/2006

Judges

  • EBEL, Circuit Judge., Before TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge, EBEL, Circuit Judge, and CASSELL, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Jeffrey C. Gosman, Gosman Law Office, Casper, WY, for Plaintiff-Appellant Lewis Herrera.

  • For Appellees:
  • Douglas E. Hamel, Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. (Amy S. Farber, Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., Houston Texas, Frank D. Neville and P. Craig Silva, Williams, Porter, Day and Neville, Casper, Wyoming, with him on the briefs), Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellee Lufkin Industries, Inc.
Copied to clipboard