United States Tenth Circuit
Initiative & Referendum Institute v. Walker, 02-4105, 02-4123
A constitutional provision imposing a supermajority requirement for enactment of initiatives on specific topics does not implicate the First Amendment freedom of speech.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/18/2006
- Published 05/18/2006
Judges
- McCONNELL, Circuit Judge., Before TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge, EBEL, KELLY, HENRY, BRISCOE, LUCERO, MURPHY, HARTZ, O'BRIEN, McCONNELL, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Tenth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Lisa Watts Baskin (Robert R. Wallace with her on the briefs), of Plant, Wallace, Christensen & Kanell, Salt Lake City, Utah, for Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees., Thom D. Roberts, Assistant Attorney General (Mark L. Shurtleff, Attorney General, with him on the briefs), Salt Lake City, Utah, for Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants., Richard G. Wilkins, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, John D. Ray, Jennifer E. Decker, and Matthew B. Hutchinson of Fabian & Clendenin, Salt Lake City, Utah, filed an amici curiae brief for the Utah Wildlife Federation, et al., in Support of Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants.