United States Tenth Circuit

Summary judgment for defendants, a county and sheriff officials, in a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action challenging plaintiff's arrest and defendants' failure to enforce trespass laws is affirmed where there was no genuine dispute over the existence of probable cause for plaintiff's arrest, and the district court properly found plaintiff's evidentiary showing on his equal protection claim legally insufficient.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/27/2006
• Published 04/27/2006

Judges

• MURPHY, Circuit Judge., Before LUCERO, EBEL, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Submitted on the briefs: , John M. Butler of John Mack Butler & Associates, Tulsa, OK, for Plaintiff-Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Andy A. Artus and Robert R. Jones Oklahoma City, OK, for Defendants-Appellees.