United States Tenth Circuit

A judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict against defendant, an insurer, in an uninsured motorist coverage dispute is affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) finding that plaintiff was a "named insured" under the policy at issue; 2) ruling that plaintiff was entitled to stack uninsured motorist benefits; 3) denial of a motion for summary judgment; 4) jury instructions; and 5) punitive damages.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/11/2006
• Published 04/11/2006

Judges

• HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge., Before BRISCOE, HOLLOWAY and SEYMOUR, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Christopher M. Murphy (Brently C. Olsson with him on the brief), Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest, Oklahoma City, OK, for the Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Elizabeth R. Castleberry, Esq. (James A. Scimeca, Esq. and Jack S. Dawson, Esq., with her on the brief), Miller Dollarhide, Oklahoma City, OK, for the Appellee.