United States Tenth Circuit

Summary judgment for defendants, steel manufacturers, in a suit alleging discrimination in violation of the Robinson-Patman Act and state law claims is affirmed where an arbitration agreement was valid, the district court properly concluded damages claims were collaterally estopped by a previous arbitration award, and plaintiff lacked antitrust standing to pursue injunctive relief.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/01/2006
• Published 03/01/2006

Judges

• STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge., Before LUCERO, ANDERSON, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• David A. Rameden, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Overland Park, Kansas (Jerrod A. Westfahl, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Overland Park, Kansas, and James R. Eiszner, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Kansas City, Missouri, with him on the briefs), for Plaintiff-Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• George E. Leonard (Dennis D. Palmer with him on the brief), Shughart, Thomson & Kilroy, P.C., Kansas City, Missouri, for Defendants-Appellees.