United States Tenth Circuit

Defendants' drug convictions are affirmed over their claim that the district court improperly allowed testimony from an undercover officer based on evidence that should have been disclosed prior to trial.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/27/2005
• Published 10/27/2005

Judges

• TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge., Before MURPHY, BALDOCK, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• J. David Ogle, Ogle & Welch, P.C., Oklahoma City, OK, for Defendant-Appellant in Case No. 04-6033., Paul Antonio Lacy, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Oklahoma City, OK, for Defendant-Appellant in Case No. 04-6005 submitted on the briefs., R. Scott Adams, Adams & Associates, P.C., Oklahoma City, OK, for Defendant-Appellant in Case No. 04-6055 submitted on the briefs., Randal A. Sengel, Assistant United States Attorney (Robert G. McCampbell, United States Attorney, with him on the briefs, and Sue Tuck Richmond, Assistant United States Attorney, with him on the brief for Case No. 04-6005), Office of the United States Attorney, Oklahoma City, OK, for Plaintiff-Appellee in Case Nos. 04-6005, 04-6033, and 04-6055.