Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Tenth Circuit


Procter & Gamble Co. v. Haugen, 03-4234

Dismissal of plaintiff's Lanham Act claim is reversed where the district court abused its discretion in ruling that plaintiff's expert testimony was inadmissible.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 10/20/2005
  • Published 10/20/2005

Judges

  • BRISCOE, Circuit Judge., Before KELLY, BRISCOE, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Arthur R. Miller, Cambridge, MA (Tracy H. Fowler, Michael D. Zimmerman, and James D. Gardner, Snell & Wilmer, Salt Lake City, UT, and Stanley M. Chesley and Paul M. DeMarco, Waite Schneider Bayless & Chesley Co., LPA, Cincinnati, OH, with him on the briefs), for plaintiffs-appellants., David H. Remes, Covington & Burling, Washington, DC, for Microsoft Corporation, ExxonMobil Corporation, Nike, Inc., and Lawyers for Civil Justice, as Amici Curiae.

  • For Appellees:
  • Joseph J. Joyce (Kristin A. VanOrman and James D. Franckowiak with him on the briefs), Strong & Hanni, Salt Lake City, UT, for defendants-appellees.
Copied to clipboard