Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Tenth Circuit


Stanko v. Mahar, 04-8084

Dismissal of plaintiff's complaint, alleging that defendant-brand inspector illegally seized his livestock, is affirmed where the procedure provided prior to the seizure of the cattle met due process requirements.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/17/2005
  • Published 08/17/2005

Judges

  • McKAY, Circuit Judge., Before LUCERO, McKAY, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Rudy Stanko, Gordon, Nebraska, Plaintiff-Appellant, Pro se.

  • For Appellees:
  • Patrick J. Crank, Attorney General, John W. Renneisen, Deputy Attorney General, Misha Westby, Senior Assistant Attorney General, David L. Delicath, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Cheyenne, Wyoming for Defendant-Appellee.
Copied to clipboard