United States Tenth Circuit
Stanko v. Mahar, 04-8084
Dismissal of plaintiff's complaint, alleging that defendant-brand inspector illegally seized his livestock, is affirmed where the procedure provided prior to the seizure of the cattle met due process requirements.
Appellate Information
- Decided 08/17/2005
- Published 08/17/2005
Judges
- McKAY, Circuit Judge., Before LUCERO, McKAY, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Tenth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Rudy Stanko, Gordon, Nebraska, Plaintiff-Appellant, Pro se.
- For Appellees:
- Patrick J. Crank, Attorney General, John W. Renneisen, Deputy Attorney General, Misha Westby, Senior Assistant Attorney General, David L. Delicath, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Cheyenne, Wyoming for Defendant-Appellee.