Skip to main content

United States Tenth Circuit


US v. Stiger, 03-5043

The district court abused its discretion by failing to investigate defendant's non-frivolous allegation, claiming that his attorney had a conflict of interest, and the issue is remanded with instructions to hold an evidentiary hearing.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/01/2005
  • Published 07/01/2005

Judges

  • TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge., Before TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge, EBEL and HARTZ, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Susan G. James, Law Office of Susan G. James & Associates, Montgomery, AL, appearing for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Kevin C. Danielson, Assistant United States Attorney (David E. O'Meilia, United States Attorney, with him on the brief), Office of the United States Attorney, Tulsa, OK, appearing for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard