United States Tenth Circuit
US v. PLATTE, 03-1345, 03-1347, 03-1353
Defendants' convictions for destroying national-defense materials is affirmed over their claims that 1)the evidence was insufficient, 2)the district court improperly denied their request for a good-faith jury instruction, and 3)the term national defense is unconstitutionally overbroad and vague.
Appellate Information
- Decided 03/18/2005
- Published 03/18/2005
Judges
- HARTZ, Circuit Judge., Before HARTZ, ANDERSON, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Tenth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Scott T. Poland of Poland & Wheeler, Lakewood, CO, for Defendant-Appellant Platte., Clifford J. Barnard, Boulder, CO, for Defendant-Appellant Hudson., Susan J. Tyburski of Boyle & Tyburski, Denver, CO, for Defendant-Appellant Gilbert., James C. Murphy, Assistant United States Attorney (John W. Suthers, United States Attorney, and Robert M. Brown, Assistant United States Attorney, with him on the brief), Denver, CO, for Plaintiff-Appellee.