United States Tenth Circuit
E.SPIRE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REG. COMM., 03-2161
In a dispute concerning telecommunication pricing, the district court correctly decided that defendant was not arbitrary and capricious in exercising its continuing jurisdiction to interpret and enforce an Interconnection Agreement against plaintiff.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/22/2004
- Published 12/22/2004
Judges
- McKAY, Circuit Judge., Before HARTZ, McKAY, and O'BRIEN, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Tenth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- David M. Kaufman of David M. Kaufman P.C., Santa Fe, NM, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Margaret Caffey-Moquin, Associate General Counsel (James C. Martin, General Counsel, with her on the brief), Santa Fe, NM, for Defendant-Appellee New Mexico Public Regulation Commission and its Commissioners., Mary Rose Hughes of Perkins Coie LLP, Washington, DC (Stephen S. Hamilton of Montgomery & Andrews, P.A., Santa Fe, NM, with her on the brief), for Defendant-Appellee Qwest Corporation.