Skip to main content

United States Tenth Circuit


US v. NICHOLS, 03-3284

In a drug case, defendant unsuccessfully challenged his conviction based on Fourth Amendment challenges to the traffic stop, on claims testimony regarding a third traffic stop that should have been held inadmissible under FRE 404(b) and on insufficiency of the evidence.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/06/2004
  • Published 07/06/2004

Judges

  • ANDERSON, Circuit Judge., Before TACHA, Chief Judge, ANDERSON and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Stephen W. Kessler, Topeka, KS, for Defendant-Appellant., Eric F. Melgren, United States Attorney, Anthony W. Mattivi, Assistant United States Attorney, Topeka, KS, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Copied to clipboard