Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Tenth Circuit


SANTANA v. CITY OF TULSA, 03-5056

As long as procedural due process standards are met and no unreasonable municipal actions are shown, a nuisance abatement action does not violate the Fourth Amendment. Because defendant removed the property from plaintiff's backyard under the authority of a nuisance ordinance, it is exempted from tort liability under the Oklahoma Governmental Torts and Claims Act.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 02/25/2004
  • Published 02/25/2004

Judges

  • McCONNELL, Circuit Judge., Before McCONNELL, ANDERSON, and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Eddie Santana, pro se.

  • For Appellees:
  • Martha Rupp Carter, City Attorney, Andrew T. Rees, Senior Assistant City Attorney, City of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma, for Defendant-Appellee.
Copied to clipboard