United States Tenth Circuit
NEAL v. ROCHE, 02-6381
In a Title VII action, summary judgment to defendant is affirmed where neither the dicta rule nor due process prevents application of Randle, and defendant's decision to save a white employee from an impending layoff by giving her preference over an African-American employee not facing a layoff, does not give rise to an inference of discrimination.
Appellate Information
- Decided 11/18/2003
- Published 11/18/2003
Judges
- McCONNELL, Circuit Judge., Before EBEL, PORFILIO, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Tenth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Submitted on the briefs: Melvin C. Hall of Riggs, Abney, Neal, Turpen, Orbison & Lewis, Oklahoma City, OK, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Robert G. McCampbell, United States Attorney, H. Lee Schmidt, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Oklahoma City, OK, for Defendant-Appellee.