United States Tenth Circuit

The district court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress evidence found during a canine search of defendant's vehicle is affirmed where the troopers' conduct did not violate the Fourth Amendment.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/22/2003
• Published 10/22/2003

Judges

• TACHA, Chief Judge., Before TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge, EBEL and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Submitted on the briefs:   David S. Rauzi, Law Offices of David S. Rauzi, Kansas City, Missouri, appearing for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Eric F. Melgren, United States Attorney, Nancy Landis Caplinger, Assistant United States Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Topeka, Kansas, appearing for Appellee.