United States Tenth Circuit

Judgment in favor of the plaintiff is affirmed, as the district court did not abuse its discretion by ruling expert testimony was admissible where the underlying medical literature adequately supported the opinion, the expert's general causation opinion was reliable and the differential diagnosis was also reliable.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/09/2003
• Published 10/09/2003

Judges

• PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge., Before KELLY, HENRY, and HARTZ, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Lawrence M. Mann,Alper & Mann, P.C., Washington, D.C., (and Christopher B. Little, Montgomery, Little & McGrew, P.C., Englewood, CO, with him on the brief), for Plaintiff-Appellee., James W. Erwin (and Thomas R. Jayne, Thompson, Coburn, L.L.P., St. Louis, MO, and Steven E. Napper, Denver, CO, on the briefs), for Defendant-Appellant.