United States Tenth Circuit

In appeals from an armed bank robbery conviction, 1) trial judge's response to the jury's note was not plain error, 2) evidence was sufficient to support defendant's conviction as a principal, and 3) an obstruction-of-justice enhancement was proper as it was based on a sufficiently reliable informant's statement.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/07/2003
• Published 08/07/2003

Judges

• HARTZ, Circuit Judge., Before LUCERO, HARTZ, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Edward K. Brass, Salt Lake City, UT, for Defendant-Appellant., Diana Hagen, Assistant United States Attorney (Paul M. Warner, United States Attorney, with her on the brief), Salt Lake City, UT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.