United States Tenth Circuit

Although psychological or psychiatric evidence negating specific intent may be admissible, defendant relied upon an impermissible legal theory for admitting the evidence, and failed to identify a relationship between the proposed testimony and his mens rea.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/15/2003
• Published 04/15/2003

Judges

• MURPHY, Circuit Judge., Before KELLY, McKAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Matthew H. Mead, United States Attorney, David A. Kubichek, Assistant United States Attorney, Casper, Wyoming, for Plaintiff-Appellee., James P. Castberg, Sheridan, Wyoming, for Defendant-Appellant.