Skip to main content

United States Tenth Circuit


KIRTDOLL v. CITY OF TOPEKA, 02-3229

No relief is available to plaintiff, alleging that defendants violated his Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights by demolishing his property, under 42 U.S.C. 1983 because he did not state an adequate factual basis for tolling the statute of limitations.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 01/02/2003
  • Published 01/03/2003

Judges

  • McKAY, Circuit Judge., Before KELLY, McKAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Frank L. Kirtdoll, pro se, Topeka, KS.

  • For Appellees:
  • Mary Beth Mudrick, City of Topeka, KS, for Defendants-Appellees.
Copied to clipboard