Skip to main content

United States Tenth Circuit


US v. OVERHOLT, 00-5074/5081

In a Safe Drinking Water Act action, no plain error existed in jury instruction setting forth what substances could be injected into wells at issue, and the word "willful" in 42 U.S.C. section 300h-2(b)(2) does not require proof of knowledge of the regulation allegedly violated.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 10/10/2002
  • Published 10/10/2002

Judges

Court

  • United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

Copied to clipboard