United States Tenth Circuit
US v. OVERHOLT, 00-5074/5081
In a Safe Drinking Water Act action, no plain error existed in jury instruction setting forth what substances could be injected into wells at issue, and the word "willful" in 42 U.S.C. section 300h-2(b)(2) does not require proof of knowledge of the regulation allegedly violated.
Appellate Information
- Decided 10/10/2002
- Published 10/10/2002
Judges
Court
- United States Tenth Circuit