United States Tenth Circuit

A voice message was not definite enough to serve as an anticipatory repudiation in a contract claim, and antitrust claims fail where claimant did not introduce evidence allowing a jury to 1) find a worldwide market, or 2) infer a conspiracy to monopolize.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/19/2002
• Published 09/19/2002

Judges

• BRORBY, Senior Circuit Judge., Before KELLY, Circuit Judge, BRORBY, Senior Circuit Judge, and HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• P. Bruce Badger,Robert A. Garda and Stanford B. Owen of Fabian & Clendenin, Salt Lake City, UT;  and Evan A. Schmutz of Hill, Johnson & Schmutz, P.C. Provo, UT, with him on the briefs of Fabian & Clendenin, Salt Lake City, UT, for Plaintiffs-Counter Defendants-Appellants., Stanley J. Preston, R. Brent Stephens and Maralyn M. Reger with him on the brief of Snow, Christensen & Martineau, Salt Lake City, UT, for Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellee.