Skip to main content

United States Tenth Circuit


SAIZ v. BARNETT, 01-1299

In granting habeas relief, the district court erred by failing to analyze the state court's conclusion, that error in excluding proffered testimony was harmless, for objective reasonableness under the AEDPA.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/23/2002
  • Published 07/23/2002

Judges

  • BALDOCK, Circuit Judge., Before SEYMOUR, BALDOCK, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Walter L. Gerash of Walter L. Gerash Law Firm, P.C., Denver, CO, for Petitioner-Appellee., Michael J. Milne, Senior Deputy District Attorney, Special Attorney General (Robert S. Grant, District Attorney, Steven L. Bernard, Assistant District Attorney, Special Attorney General, with him on the briefs) Brighton, CO, for Respondents-Appellants.
Copied to clipboard