United States Tenth Circuit

A sentence of twenty-four months on a second revocation of supervised release exceeded the statutory maximum allowed under 18 U.S.C. section 3583(e)(3), where the court failed to deduct the term of imprisonment imposed pursuant to appellant's first supervised release revocation.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/17/2002
• Published 05/17/2002

Judges

• SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge., Before SEYMOUR, HENRY and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Submitted on the briefs:  Deirdre A. Gorman, Ogden, UT, for Defendant-Appellant., Paul M. Warner, United States Attorney, and Wayne T. Dance, Assistant United States Attorney, Appellate Division, Salt Lake City, UT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.