United States Tenth Circuit

Use of video conferencing at sentencing violates the provision of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 43, which requires a defendant to be "present" at the imposition of sentence.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/16/2002
• Published 05/16/2002

Judges

• JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge., Before HENRY, PORFILIO and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Rosanne Camunez, Las Cruces, NM, for Defendant Appellant., Alfred J. Perez, Assistant United States Attorney, (David C. Iglesias, United States Attorney, with him on the briefs), Las Cruces, NM, for Plaintiff-Appellee.