Skip to main content

United States Tenth Circuit


HARRELL v. FLEMING, 01-6134

Plaintiff's action under the Privacy Act was correctly dismissed, where the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider the case based on two-year statute of limitations, which began to run when plaintiff first became aware of errors in presentence investigation reports, seven years prior to filing suit; a new cause of action does not arise upon each subsequent adverse determination based on erroneous records.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 04/10/2002
  • Published 04/10/2002

Judges

  • LUCERO, Circuit Judge., Before LUCERO, PORFILIO, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Submitted on Appellant's brief:  Wilson Tony Harrell, Pro Se.

Copied to clipboard