United States Tenth Circuit

In a Title VII action alleging gender and pregnancy discrimination by a university regarding the revocation of a fellowship, the plaintiff was found not to have exhausted her administrative remedies, however because the university was not deemed to be the plaintiff's employer, remanded for further findings.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/13/2002
• Published 03/13/2002

Judges

• SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge., Before SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge, McKAY, Senior Circuit Judge, and MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Mark E. Rau,The Frickey Law Firm, Lakewood, Colorado (Cecilia M. Serna, P.C., Lakewood, CO, on the opening brief), for Plaintiff-Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• David P. Temple, Office of University Counsel, Denver, CO, for The Regents of the University of Colorado, Defendant-Appellee., Nina Y. Wang, Assistant United States Attorney (Richard T. Spriggs, United States Attorney, and Kathleen L. Torres, Asst. U.S. Attorney, with her on the brief), Denver, CO, for National Institute of Standards and Technology, Defendant-Appellee.