United States Tenth Circuit

A state court's specific holding that a judgment is not void does not lack preclusive force for collateral estoppel purposes even if it was legally erroneous.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/31/2001
• Published 07/31/2001

Judges

• EBEL, Circuit Judge., Before EBEL, BALDOCK and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• James E. Rumsey, Lawrence, KS, for Plaintiff-Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• J. Steven Pigg, Fisher, Patterson, Sayler & Smith, L.L.P., Topeka, KS, for Defendants-Appellees.