United States Tenth Circuit

In a breach of contract case, evidence that defendant's internal policy required consultation with its engineering department before entering into a contract is admissible to show defendant's statements to plaintiff that its documents were "cursory views" expressed no intention to enter into the contract.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/13/2001
• Published 07/13/2001

Judges

• SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge., Before SEYMOUR and McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BELOT, District Judge.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Joe M. Fears, (Robert J. Bartz with him on the briefs) of Barber & Bartz, P.C., Tulsa, OK, for Plaintiff-Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Craig W. Hoster, (Alexander F. King with him on the brief) of Crowe & Dunlevy, Tulsa, OK, for Defendant-Appellee.