United States Tenth Circuit

Under 28 USC 1367(c), a court may dismiss supplemental state law claims that are closely related to the federal claims that it has already dismissed.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/20/2001
• Published 06/20/2001

Judges

• McKAY, Circuit Judge., Before KELLY, McKAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Emil A. Tonkovich, pro se (Richard P. Hutchison of Landmark Legal Foundation, Kansas City, Missouri, on the briefs).


• For Appellees:
  
• William Scott Hesse, Assistant Attorney General, State of Kansas, Topeka, KS, (Timothy B. Mustaine of Foulston & Siefkin L.L.P., Wichita, KS, for Appellee Jerry;  Bruce D. Mayfield, Overland Park, KS, and Michael Evan Jaffe of Arent, Fox, Kintner, Plotkin & Kahn, Washington, DC, for Appellees Dayton, Robinson, Schroeder, Shapiro, and Sward;  Tammy M. Samogye of Lathrop & Gage L.C., Overland Park, KS, for Appellees Turnbull, Dahl, Johnsen, Michel, and Ringer;  Thomas A. Hamill of Martin, Pringle, Oliver, Wallace & Swartz, L.L.P., Overland Park, KS, for Appellees Marino and Thomas;  Jeffrey A. Chanay of Entz & Chanay, Topeka, Kansas, for Appellees Brinkman, Budig, Hemenway, Shankel, and Shulenberger;  John I. O'Connor of The Advocates Group, Pittsburg, KS, for Appellee MacKenzie;  Carla J. Stovall, Attorney General for the State of Kansas, Topeka, KS, for Appellees Caldwell, Hammond, Hiebert, Krepps, Montgomery, Nolan, Sabatini, and Warner, on the brief), for Defendants-Appellees.