United States Tenth Circuit

Amendments to Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, section 1024.1(A), narrowing the definition of "child pornography" prohibited by section 1021.2 to include only material in which a minor is actually "engaged in" or "observes" any of several statutorily defined sexual acts, mooted facial constitutional challenge to the statute.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/04/2001
• Published 05/04/2001

Judges

• BRISCOE, Circuit Judge, Before BRISCOE, MURPHY, Circuit Judges, and CROW, District Judge.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Micheal C. Salem,Salem Law Offices, Norman, Oklahoma (Vincent J. Liesenfeld, Salem Law Offices, Norman, Oklahoma;  and Mark Henricksen, Henricksen & Henricksen, El Reno, Oklahoma, for the American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma, with him on the briefs), for the appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Stacy Haws Felkner (Robert E. Manchester and Susan Ann Knight with her on the brief), Manchester & Pignato, P.C., Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for the appellees Britt High, Se Kim, Matt French, and Gregory Taylor., John M. Jacobsen, First Assistant District Attorney (Robert H. Macy, District Attorney, with him on the brief), Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for the appellees Robert H. Macy and Patricia High., Richard C. Smith, Litigation Division Head (William O. West, Municipal Counselor and Tina A. Hughes, Assistant Municipal Counselor, with him on the brief), Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for the appellees City of Oklahoma City, Sam Gonzales, Bill Citty, and M.T. Berry.