Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Tenth Circuit


US v. WILSON, 99-6348, 99-6358, 99-6383

Defendant's challenge to the calculation of forfeited amounts in criminal forfeiture proceedings of drug proceeds is not yet ripe where defendant denies possessory interest in proceeds as substantive criminal defense.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/29/2001
  • Published 03/29/2001

Judges

  • SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge., Before SEYMOUR, HENRY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Joseph L. Wells of Oklahoma City, OK, submitted briefs for Carlos Dion Hishaw.

  • For Appellees:
  • Vicki Mandell-King, Assistant Federal Public Defender, (Michael G. Katz, Federal Public Defender, with her on the briefs), Denver, CO, for Defendant-Appellant Wilson., Leslie M. Maye, Assistant United States Attorney, (Daniel G. Webber, Jr., United States Attorney, and Sue Tuck Richmond, Assistant United States Attorney, with her on the briefs), Oklahoma City, OK, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Thomas D. McCormick of Oklahoma City, OK, submitted briefs for Defendant-Appellant Burley., Daniel G. Webber, Jr., United States Attorney, and Leslie M. Maye, Assistant United States Attorney, Oklahoma City, OK, submitted a brief in each case for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Copied to clipboard