United States Tenth Circuit
GSCHWIND v. CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY, 99-3329
Plaintiff may not void an erroneous diversity jurisdiction ruling under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) where plaintiff did not pursue the issue on direct appeal, and where such a ruling was not obvious.
Appellate Information
- Decided 11/29/2000
- Published 11/29/2000
Judges
- PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge., Before KELLY, ANDERSON, and HENRY, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Tenth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Catherine B. Slavin,Wolk & Genter, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- John C. Nettels, Jr. (and Thomas E. Nanney, Morrison & Hecker, L.L.P., Kansas City, Missouri, with him on the briefs), Morrison & Hecker, L.L.P., Wichita, Kansas, for Defendant-Appellee Cessna Aircraft Company., John W. Cowden, Baker, Sterchi, Cowden & Rice, L.L.C., Kansas City, Missouri, for Defendant-Appellee Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc.