Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Tenth Circuit


GSCHWIND v. CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY, 99-3329

Plaintiff may not void an erroneous diversity jurisdiction ruling under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) where plaintiff did not pursue the issue on direct appeal, and where such a ruling was not obvious.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 11/29/2000
  • Published 11/29/2000

Judges

  • PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge., Before KELLY, ANDERSON, and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Catherine B. Slavin,Wolk & Genter, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • John C. Nettels, Jr. (and Thomas E. Nanney, Morrison & Hecker, L.L.P., Kansas City, Missouri, with him on the briefs), Morrison & Hecker, L.L.P., Wichita, Kansas, for Defendant-Appellee Cessna Aircraft Company., John W. Cowden, Baker, Sterchi, Cowden & Rice, L.L.C., Kansas City, Missouri, for Defendant-Appellee Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc.
Copied to clipboard