United States Tenth Circuit

Jury's finding that defendant did not unlawfully convert partnership proceeds precluded the trial court from disregarding the verdict and imposing equitable relief under the theories of partnership by estoppel, piercing the corporate veil, quantum meruit, or unjust enrichment.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/06/2000
• Published 11/06/2000

Judges

• Before MURPHY and HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judges, and COOK, District Judge.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Joseph E. Manges (Paula A. Cook, with him on the brief), of Comeau, Maldegen, Templeman & Indall, LLP, Santa Fe, NM, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Stephen S. Hamilton, Montgomery & Andrews, P.A., Santa Fe, NM, (Laurice Margheim, Curtiss, Moravek, Curtiss & Magheim, Alliance, Nebraska, with him on the briefs), for Defendants-Appellants.