Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Supreme Court of Texas


Bushnell v. Mott, 06-1044

An owner of a dog not known to be vicious owes a duty to attempt to stop the dog from attacking a person after the attack has begun.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/28/2008
  • Published 03/28/2008

Judges

  • PER CURIAM.

Court

  • Supreme Court of Texas

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • James M. Richardson, Bankston & Richardson, L.L.P., J. Bruce Bennett, Cardwell, Hart & Bennett, L.L.P., Austin, and Will S. Moursund, Moursund Law Office, Round Mountain, TX, for Petitioners., Cristol Schoessow, Bryla & Schoessow, Fredericksburg, TX, for Interested Party., Marilyn Stiles Hampton Shoemaker, Austin, TX, pro se for Amicus Curiae.

  • For Appellees:
  • Don E. Weiss, Stevens & Weiss, P.C., San Antonio, TX, for Respondent.
Copied to clipboard