Supreme Court of Texas
Bushnell v. Mott, 06-1044
An owner of a dog not known to be vicious owes a duty to attempt to stop the dog from attacking a person after the attack has begun.
Appellate Information
- Decided 03/28/2008
- Published 03/28/2008
Judges
- PER CURIAM.
Court
- Supreme Court of Texas
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- James M. Richardson, Bankston & Richardson, L.L.P., J. Bruce Bennett, Cardwell, Hart & Bennett, L.L.P., Austin, and Will S. Moursund, Moursund Law Office, Round Mountain, TX, for Petitioners., Cristol Schoessow, Bryla & Schoessow, Fredericksburg, TX, for Interested Party., Marilyn Stiles Hampton Shoemaker, Austin, TX, pro se for Amicus Curiae.
- For Appellees:
- Don E. Weiss, Stevens & Weiss, P.C., San Antonio, TX, for Respondent.