Supreme Court of Texas

In a case involving a suit over the alleged nonpayment of a promissory note, a court of appeals' reversal of a judgment in favor of a bank is reversed and remanded for further consideration where the court of appeals failed to explain with adequate specificity why it substituted its judgment for that of the trial court with regards to a finding of nonpayment.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/09/2006
• Published 06/09/2006

Judges

• PER CURIAM.

Court

• Supreme Court of Texas

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Chad Michael Ruback, Godwin Gruber, LLP, Dallas, and John R. Hines III, Waxahachie, for Petitioner., Richard B. Engel, Mabank, pro se., Richard F. Karamatic, Misson, pro se.


• For Appellees:
  
• R. Michael Groom, Groom & Groom, Houston, Terry L. Jacobson, Ron Edmondson, Jacobson Beard & Edmondson, P.C., Corsicana, for Respondent.