Supreme Court of Texas

A court of appeals judgment rejecting plaintiffs' challenge to the factual sufficiency of several jury findings in a medical malpractice case is reversed where plaintiffs are entitled to a written opinion stating why the jury's verdict can or cannot be set aside.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/09/2006
• Published 06/09/2006

Judges

• PER CURIAM.

Court

• Supreme Court of Texas

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Levon G. Hovnatanian, Martin Disiere Jefferson & Wisdom, L.L.P., John M. O'Quinn, O'Quinn Laminack & Pirtle, Houston, Jaime A. Gonzalez, Gonzalez & Associates, McAllen, David W. Holman, Godwin Pappas Langley Ronquillo, LLP, Robert Alan York, Godwin Gruber, LLP, Benjamin L. Hall III, The Hall Law Firm, and Holly Melissa Wheeler, Houston, for Petitioners.


• For Appellees:
  
• Richard A. Sheehy, Sheehy, Serpe & ware, P.C., Houston, Steven M. Gonzalez, Gonzales Gaytan Garza & Castillo, LLP, McAllen, Robert B. Dubose, Robert M. Roach Jr., Sean Reed Cox, Cook & Roach, L.L.P., Houston, Christopher C. Franz, The Franz Law Firm, McAllen, Charles E. Sweetman, Sweetman & Wise, Brownsville, for Respondents.