Supreme Court of Texas
TEXAS STATE BANK v. AMARO, 00-1220
The district court had continuing jurisdiction over the trust, under Property Code section 142.005, but the judgment exceeded the relief plaintiff's motion requested, and its order should not have encompassed approving plaintiff's investment philosophy, nor ruling on plaintiff's potential tort liability.
Appellate Information
- Argued 10/03/2001
- Decided 03/28/2002
- Published 03/28/2002
Judges
- Justice RODRIGUEZ delivered the opinion of the Court.
Court
- Supreme Court of Texas
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Lisa Powell,Gary Gurwitz, Sofia Amabel Ramon, Atlas & Hall, McAllen, for petitioner.
- For Appellees:
- Benjamin L. Hall, III,Elizabeth B. Hawkins, Hall Law Firm, Russell S. Post, Hogan Dubose & Townsend, Jennifer Bruch Hogan, Hogan Dubose & Townsend, L.L.P., John K. Leach, O'Quinn Laminack & Pirtle, Houston, for respondent.