Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Sakil v. State, PD-0971-08
Defendant's assault conviction is affirmed, where the trial court properly included an instruction in the jury charge stating that voluntary intoxication is not a defense, and properly utilized that instruction's function to actively prevent confusion.
Appellate Information
- Decided 07/01/2009
- Published 07/01/2009
Judges
Court
- Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Fernando Chacon, Esq., and Lydia M.V. Brandt, Richardson, El Paso, for Appellant., Lisa C. McMinn, Fiorst Asst. State's Atty., Jeffrey L. Van Horn, State's Atty., Austin, for State.