Skip to main content

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas


Sakil v. State, PD-0971-08

Defendant's assault conviction is affirmed, where the trial court properly included an instruction in the jury charge stating that voluntary intoxication is not a defense, and properly utilized that instruction's function to actively prevent confusion.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/01/2009
  • Published 07/01/2009

Judges

Court

  • Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Fernando Chacon, Esq., and Lydia M.V. Brandt, Richardson, El Paso, for Appellant., Lisa C. McMinn, Fiorst Asst. State's Atty., Jeffrey L. Van Horn, State's Atty., Austin, for State.

Copied to clipboard