Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

A conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and evading arrest or detention using a vehicle is affirmed where: 1) appellant failed to demonstrate that the court of appeals incorrectly applied Seals v. State, 187 S.W.3d 417, 420 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) or negated any requirement of proof; and 2) the court of appeals did not err in holding that bleach was an adulterant or dilutant, and thus including its weight in the alleged weight of the methamphetamine.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/10/2007
• Published 10/10/2007

Judges

Court

• Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• James Rasmussen, Wichita Falls, for appellant., John Brasher, Asst. D.A., Wichita Falls, Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Austin, for state.