Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Schmidt v. State of Texas, 0402-06
A decision reversing a conviction for retaliation is reversed where: 1) the court of appeals erred in drawing a bright-line rule that a threat of harm and actual harm cannot arise from the same act and occur simultaneously, and that the threat must precede the initial harm; and 2) the evidence was legally sufficient to support the retaliation conviction.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/09/2007
- Published 05/09/2007
Judges
Court
- Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Eric Willard, Plainview, for Appellant., Lisa McMinn, Asst. State Prosecuting Atty., Matthew Paul, State's Atty., Austin, for State.