Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

A decision reversing denial of a suppression motion in a murder case is reversed where the court of appeals erred in deciding that certain written statements should not have been used by the state at defendant's trial because they were the product of custodial interrogation by the police after appellant had invoked his right to counsel.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/31/2007
• Published 01/31/2007

Judges

Court

• Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Erick A. Bovik, Austin, for appellant., Carl Bryan Case, Jr., Asst. D.A., Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Austin, for state.