Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Rodgers v. State of Texas, 0645-05
A motion to strike an expert witness's testimony based on his lack of qualifications, which is made after the witness has testified, can serve as a renewed objection to a trial court's earlier ruling that the witness was qualified. Under such circumstances, an appellate court reviews a trial court's ruling based upon all of the evidence before the court at the time of the motion to strike.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/03/2006
- Published 05/03/2006
Judges
Court
- Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- James W. Volberding, Tyler, for Appellant., Henry Whitley, Special Assistant Criminal District Attorney, Quitman, Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Austin, for State.