Skip to main content

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas


Rodgers v. State of Texas, 0645-05

A motion to strike an expert witness's testimony based on his lack of qualifications, which is made after the witness has testified, can serve as a renewed objection to a trial court's earlier ruling that the witness was qualified. Under such circumstances, an appellate court reviews a trial court's ruling based upon all of the evidence before the court at the time of the motion to strike.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/03/2006
  • Published 05/03/2006

Judges

Court

  • Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • James W. Volberding, Tyler, for Appellant., Henry Whitley, Special Assistant Criminal District Attorney, Quitman, Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Austin, for State.

Copied to clipboard