Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
HALL v. STATE OF TEXAS, 73,787
Death row inmate's mental retardation claim was properly rejected. Mental retardation is comparable to an affirmative defense, thus the burden is always on the defendant to prove that condition by a preponderance of the evidence.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/05/2004
- Published 05/05/2004
Judges
Court
- Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Danny D. Burns, Fort Worth, for Appellant., Helena F. Faulkner, Asst. DA, Fort Worth, Matthew Paul, State's Atty., Austin, for State.