Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Because the hearing on his motion to suppress and the jury trial were conducted in a unitary proceeding, defendant correctly preserved error by re-urging his motion to suppress at the introduction of the physical evidence seized from the van.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/28/2004
• Published 01/28/2004

Judges

Court

• Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Steven J. Lieberman, Houston, for Appellant., Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Asst. DA, Houston, Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Austin, for State.