Skip to main content

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas


SAUCEDA v. STATE OF TEXAS, 612-02

The Court of Appeals erred by upholding a trial court ruling, that simply asking a question for impeachment purposes rendered an entire videotaped interview of extraneous offenses admissible, under the rule of optional completeness.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 09/10/2003
  • Published 09/10/2003

Judges

  • Before the Court en banc.

Court

  • Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Shawna L. Reagin, Houston, for Appellant., Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Asst. DA, Houston, Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Austin, for State.

Copied to clipboard