Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Where the erroneous exclusion of a portion of psychiatrist's offered testimony at the punishment stage of the trial deprived defendant of his constitutional right to present witnesses to establish a defense, case remanded to appellate court for consideration of issue in light of Texas Supreme Court's decision in Potier v. State, No. 1542-99, _S.W.3d_ (Tex. Crim. App., 2/13/02).

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/17/2002
• Published 04/17/2002

Judges

Court

• Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Clifton L. Holmes, Longview, for Appellant., Matthew Paul, State's Atty., Austin, for State.