Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Because the extraneous offense evidence in this case was introduced during cross-examination and rebuttal testimony, not in the State's case-in-chief, appellant was not entitled to notice of the extraneous offenses pursuant to Article 37.07 section 3(g).

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/10/2002
• Published 04/10/2002

Judges

Court

• Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Louis E. Sturns, Arlington, for Appellant., C. James Gibson, Asst. DA, Fort Worth, Matthew Paul, State's Atty., Austin, for State.