Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Looking at the entirety of voir dire, where a prospective juror's answers on the issues of future dangerousness and impartially to judge witnesses were contradictory, but he said he would set aside his personal beliefs and follow the law, the defendant was not prejudiced by the denial of his challenge for cause.

Appellate Information

• Decided 02/20/2002
• Published 02/20/2002

Judges

Court

• Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Adam L. Seidel, Dallas, for appellant., Patricia Poppoff Noble, Assist. DA, Dallas, Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Austin, for state.